How personality types negatively impact communication between grade 12 learners when they work on group assignments

Personality factors have been identified as one of the key elements to determine effective communication. On this page, we explain how certain personality types could negatively impact communication between grade 12 learners when they work on group assignments.

NB: Please consult your textbook as the primary source. This is not a memo, but a simple guide for students

Personality factors play a significant role in shaping how individuals communicate, especially in collaborative settings like group assignments among Grade 12 learners. Certain personality traits can negatively impact communication, making teamwork more challenging.

Here are some ways in which personality types might hinder communication in group settings:

Certain personality types can negatively impact communication in group assignments among Grade 12 learners by:

  1. Dominance: Overly dominant individuals may monopolize discussions, preventing diverse ideas from emerging.
  2. Introversion: Highly introverted students might not share their valuable insights, leading to missed opportunities for the group.
  3. Inflexibility: Students resistant to new ideas can hinder the group’s creativity and problem-solving abilities.
  4. Competitiveness: Excessively competitive students may prioritize personal success over collaborative goals, creating tension.
  5. Low Emotional Intelligence: Students with low emotional intelligence may fail to recognize and respect others’ feelings, causing misunderstandings and reduced group cohesion.

1. Dominance

  • Impact: Individuals with overly dominant personalities may take control of group discussions, leaving little room for others to contribute. Their need to lead can suppress diverse ideas and opinions, leading to an environment where not all group members feel valued or heard.
  • Example: In a group project, a dominant student insists on their approach without considering others’ suggestions, causing frustration and diminishing the collaborative spirit.

2. Introversion

  • Impact: While introversion is not inherently negative, in group settings, highly introverted individuals may struggle to share their ideas or speak up, especially if the group dynamics favor more outspoken members. This can lead to valuable insights being missed and the introverted student feeling sidelined.
  • Example: An introverted student has an innovative idea for the project but feels overwhelmed by more vocal group members and ends up not sharing, leading to a loss of potential value for the group.

3. Inflexibility

  • Impact: Students who are resistant to change and new ideas can stifle the group’s creativity and adaptability. Their reluctance to consider alternative viewpoints or approaches can hinder the group’s ability to innovate and solve problems effectively.
  • Example: A student refuses to adapt the project’s direction based on new information, causing conflicts and impeding progress.

4. Competitiveness

  • Impact: A highly competitive personality might focus more on winning or being the best, rather than on the collaborative goal of the group. This can create tension, reduce cooperation, and lead to conflicts among group members.
  • Example: A competitive student prioritizes their own contributions to ensure they stand out, neglecting the collaborative nature of the assignment and causing discord within the group.

5. Low Emotional Intelligence

  • Impact: Emotional intelligence is crucial for empathetic and effective communication. Students with lower emotional intelligence may struggle to understand or value the emotions and perspectives of others, leading to misunderstandings and a lack of cohesion in the group.
  • Example: A student dismisses another’s anxiety over deadlines, saying they should just deal with it, leading to increased stress and a breakdown in communication.

Mitigating Negative Impacts

To counteract these negative impacts, it’s important for group members to be aware of their own and others’ personality traits. Open discussion, setting clear communication guidelines, and assigning roles that suit individual strengths can help ensure that all voices are heard and valued. Educators can facilitate this by teaching and modeling effective communication strategies and emotional intelligence, ensuring a more inclusive and productive group work environment.

Below is some optional content gathered from online sources. NB, please consult approved and prescribed learning content at your school at all times:

Looking for something specific?